www Husbandlaw.com
Home Contact Us About Us What's New Publications Video

 Services Provided

   
  Federal Tax Representation
  Syndication
  Contracts
  Horse Business Matters
  Litigation
   
Syndication

The term "syndication" applied to a horse generally means division of ownership, but this division of ownership can take several forms. 

One of these forms used for breeding stallions is referred to as an "undivided fractional interest" syndicate.  In this form, each co-owner, or member of the syndicate has ownership of"an undivided fractional interest" in each molecule of the stallion, subject to the terms of the syndicate agreement.  The syndicate agreement usually provides for each co-owner to receive certain breeding rights, each for their own use.  "Shares" of undivided fractional interest syndicates are considered tangible personal property, so each co-owner can deduct their cost by depreciation using the modified accelerated cost recovery system ("MACRS"), or if the co-owner is eligible to use the "expensing provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 179, a co-owner might deduct entirely in the year purchased the cost of purchase of an undivided fractional interest in a stallion syndicate. 

The undivided fractional interest syndicate, if done properly in NOT considered a "security" in the sense that the term "security" is used by the Securities and Exchange Commission".  The conditions and reasons under which an undivided fractional interest breeding stallion syndicate are considered NOT to be a security are set forth in "no action" letters issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in the 1970's.  If the terms and conditions of these "no action" letters are followed, the SEC will recommend that its enforcement division take "no action" against the person or entity selling the stallion syndicate shares.  What this means is that the seller does not need to prepare a disclosure document such as a "Private Placement Memorandum" and deliver this document to each prospective buyer before selling a syndicate share, and that laws which apply to the subsequent sale of securities need not be followed.

A "security" has been defined by the U.S. Supreme Court as a situation where a person invests in a COMMON VENTURE with another person (or entity) with an EXPECTATION OF PROFIT BASED IN WHOLE OR IN PART ON THE EFFORTS OF THE SELLER OR A THIRD PARTY.  So, if a stallion syndicate where formed under which the buyers or syndicate members simply bought interests in the stallion, then either made money, or didn't, based on whether the syndicate manager could sell breedings profitably and splitting all of the income from the sales of the breedings, this stallion syndicate would be considered a security, because the members are in a common venture (splitting the income from sales of breeding rights) with an expectation of profit based on whether or not the syndicate manager can sell the breedings profitably.

There are many different deals struck in the formation of stallion syndicates.  Sometimes, particularly when strong management control of the stallion by a seller of the shares (sometimes a breeder/seller wants to maintain more control than is permitted by the principles of the relevant"no-action" letters) a stallion syndicate may be a security under the meaning used by the SEC.  This is not necessarily a bad thing.  Profitable and successful stallion syndicates have been formed as securities.  It does mean that the laws for sales of securities must be followed.

This firm has formed stallion syndicates of both types, as securities and as non-security undivided fractional interest types.  The form which is appropriate must be determined in a case by case basis, based upon the needs and desires of the owner/seller in each particular situation.

Syndicates are also used for racing.  In racing, the horse can only run once in each race, so a horse racing for co-owners is a common venture.  However, if a horse is co-owned by two or three people, each of whom has equal authority and control in the management of the racing career of the horse, then the situation would NOT be a security, because none of the co-owners is relying on the efforts of a third party to make a profit, but rather are relying on their own skill and efforts, jointly with their partners.  Some racing partnerships are securities; other racing partnerships are not securities.  This is a technical area and must be approached on a case by case basis.  The firm can create racing partnerships (and/or other entities, such as Limited liability companies or LLCs) for both securities type and non-securities type racing syndicate.

Providing Legal Services
Entertainment Law
Equine law
Tax Controversies
Business Law
Non-Profit Organization

 

 
 
© Copyright 2006  Husbandlaw.com  All Rights Reserved
designed by www.panelo.com